Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm: assabet_defconfig: disable IDE subsystem | Date | Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:24:46 +0100 |
| |
On Monday, October 31, 2016 07:14:13 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 03:46:22 PM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 04:37:31 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:59:23 PM CEST Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, July 08, 2016 10:23:48 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, July 8, 2016 5:24:41 PM CEST Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > > This patch disables deprecated IDE subsystem in assabet_defconfig > > > > > > > (no IDE host drivers are selected in this config so there is no > > > > > > > valid reason to enable IDE subsystem itself). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the series makes a lot of sense. I have checked your assertions > > > > > > in the changelogs and found no flaws in your logic, so I think we should > > > > > > take them all through arm-soc unless there are other concerns. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > Should I resend everything or just patches that were not reposted yet > > > > > (the ones that were marked as RFT initially and got no feedback)? > > > > > > > > I'd be fine with just getting a pull request with all the patches that > > > > had no negative feedback and that were not already applied (if any). > > > > > > Here it is (sorry for taking so long). > > > > I've just been digging in the dmesg logs from when I was using the > > Assabet+Neponset as my firewall, and it was having to use the IDE > > ide-cs driver rather than the pata pcmcia driver. > > > > I don't recall whether the pata pcmcia driver was a problem or not, > > as the PCMCIA interface can't cope with _any_ 32-bit accesses. I > > think PATA tries to use the "highest" possible access size by > > default... > > It doesn't actually - it defaults to 16-bits for PIO data access and > you must explicitly enable 32-bits using ATA_PFLAG_PIO32 port flag > (pata_pcmcia doesn't set it so it should be okay). Also taskfile > registers are accessed using 8-bits access by default transport > functions (which are used by pata_pcmcia).
Please also note that:
- assebet_defconfig currently doesn't even enable ide-cs (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS) in the mainline kernel
- neponset_defconfig doesn't even enable IDE (CONFIG_IDE) in the mainline kernel
so there is no risk of breaking anything.. :-)
Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
| |