lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 12/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add "info" files to resctrl file system
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> + .mode = 0444,
> >> + .kf_ops = &rdtgroup_kf_single_ops,
> >> + .seq_show = rdt_num_closid_show,
> >> + },
> >> + {
> >> + .name = "cbm_val",
> >
> > cbm_val? Is that a value? No, it's the valid bitmask which you can set. So
> > cmb_mask or something else which is unambiguous is what you want here.
> >
> > This is a user space interface and we really must make it as intuitive as
> > possible.
>
> It's a bit mask for cache resources. But this interface will also control resources that are not caches, so I'd like to avoid "cbm" in the name. Perhaps "max_val"?
>

max_val is misleading if it's always a bit mask. 'bitmask' might not be the
worst choice then.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-26 19:36    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog