lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/14] staging: fsl-mc: cleanup and uprev to MC v10.x
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:43:56PM +0000, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:50 AM
> > To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
> > Cc: German Rivera <german.rivera@nxp.com>; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > agraf@suse.de; arnd@arndb.de; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] staging: fsl-mc: cleanup and uprev to MC v10.x
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:42:09PM -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > > This patch does miscellaneous minor cleanup and uprevs the supported
> > > MC firmware version to 10.x.
> > >
> > > I believe with this series the TODO items on our list are complete,
> > > with the exception of "Add at least one device driver for a DPAA2
> > > object", which I expect to send a patch for very soon. I plan to
> > > do that in conjunction with a request to move the fsl-mc bus
> > > driver out of staging.
> >
> > I applied some of these patches, can you rebase and fix up and resend
> > the remaining ones?
>
> Yes, will resend.
>
> Regarding the patch:
> [PATCH 14/14] staging: fsl-mc: uprev binary interface to match MC v10.x
>
> ...your comment was that it did a lot of different things at once. In
> this case, there is no way for me to break that up. The things listed
> in that patch were the changes to the binary interface of the hardware,
> and to match it we have to change everything at once.

Ah, ok, make that a bit more specific in the patch changelog text so I
don't ask the same thing when you resend it and I re-review it :)

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-25 20:10    [W:0.032 / U:9.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site