lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFT v2 07/17] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Enable the usb20 "per" clk on phy_clk_enable
From
Date
On 10/25/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2016 10:16 PM, ahaslam@baylibre.com wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c
>> index 9e41a7f..982e105 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c
>> @@ -53,11 +53,19 @@ int __init da8xx_register_usb_refclkin(int rate)
>>
>> static void usb20_phy_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>> {
>> + struct clk *usb20_clk;
>> u32 val;
>> u32 timeout = 500000; /* 500 msec */
>>
>> val = readl(DA8XX_SYSCFG0_VIRT(DA8XX_CFGCHIP2_REG));
>>
>> + usb20_clk = clk_get(NULL, "usb20");
>
> We should not be using a NULL device pointer here. Can you pass the musb
> device pointer available in the same file? Also, da850_clks[] in da850.c
> needs to be fixed to add the matching device name.

This clock can be used for usb 1.1 PHY even when musb is not being used,
so I don't think we can depend on having a musb device here.

Also, in a previous review, it was decided that the usb clocks should
*not* be added to da850_clks[] [1]. Instead, they are dynamically
registered elsewhere.


[1]: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2396533

>
>> + if (IS_ERR(usb20_clk)) {
>> + pr_err("could not get usb20 clk\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-25 18:05    [W:0.091 / U:9.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site