lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/25, Roman Pen wrote:
>>
>> This patch avoids allocation of kthread structure on a stack, and simply
>> uses kmalloc.
>
> Oh. I didn't even read this patch, but I have to admit I personally do not
> like it. I can be wrong, but imo this is the step to the wrong direction.

it targets only one thing - we can't use stack anymore for keeping kthread
structure on it. so basically it is not even a step, just an attempt to
fix memory corruption after oops.

> struct kthread is already bloated, we should not bloat it more.

that is clear, but I wanted to keep code simpler with one allocation and
one structure for all the needs.

> Instead we should kill it. And to_kthread() too, at least in its current
> form.

that is nice and this is a step forward, but not with this patch.

>
> For example. parked/exited/cpu should go into smp_hotplug_thread. Yes,
> this needs cleanups.
>
> All we need is kthread_data() which returns the pointer to the private
> data used by kthread.

that means that we still need to store the private data inside task_struct
and probably again abuse some member.

>
> As for kthread_stop(), we no longer need to abuse ->vfork_done, we can
> use task_works:

yes, that can be done easily. in the current patch I already use the
task_work to free the kthread structure. but still for me is not clear
where to keep the private data if you have only task_struct in your
hands.

--
Roman

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-25 17:47    [W:0.133 / U:1.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site