lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 06/12] vfio_pci: Update vfio_pci to use vfio_info_add_capability()
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:52:39 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:

> On 10/21/2016 12:54 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:52:06 +0530
> > Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Update msix_sparse_mmap_cap() to use vfio_info_add_capability()
> >> Update region type capability to use vfio_info_add_capability()
> >> Can't split this commit for MSIx and region_type cap since there is a
> >> common code which need to be updated for both the cases.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
> >> Change-Id: I52bb28c7875a6da5a79ddad1843e6088aff58a45
> >> ---
> >> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> >> index d624a527777f..1ec0565b48ea 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> >> @@ -556,12 +556,12 @@ static int vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int msix_sparse_mmap_cap(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> >> + struct vfio_region_info *info,
> >> struct vfio_info_cap *caps)
> >> {
> >> - struct vfio_info_cap_header *header;
> >> struct vfio_region_info_cap_sparse_mmap *sparse;
> >> size_t end, size;
> >> - int nr_areas = 2, i = 0;
> >> + int nr_areas = 2, i = 0, ret;
> >>
> >> end = pci_resource_len(vdev->pdev, vdev->msix_bar);
> >>
> >> @@ -572,13 +572,10 @@ static int msix_sparse_mmap_cap(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> >>
> >> size = sizeof(*sparse) + (nr_areas * sizeof(*sparse->areas));
> >>
> >> - header = vfio_info_cap_add(caps, size,
> >> - VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_SPARSE_MMAP, 1);
> >> - if (IS_ERR(header))
> >> - return PTR_ERR(header);
> >> + sparse = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!sparse)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> - sparse = container_of(header,
> >> - struct vfio_region_info_cap_sparse_mmap, header);
> >> sparse->nr_areas = nr_areas;
> >>
> >> if (vdev->msix_offset & PAGE_MASK) {
> >> @@ -594,26 +591,11 @@ static int msix_sparse_mmap_cap(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> >> i++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - return 0;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static int region_type_cap(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> >> - struct vfio_info_cap *caps,
> >> - unsigned int type, unsigned int subtype)
> >> -{
> >> - struct vfio_info_cap_header *header;
> >> - struct vfio_region_info_cap_type *cap;
> >> -
> >> - header = vfio_info_cap_add(caps, sizeof(*cap),
> >> - VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_TYPE, 1);
> >> - if (IS_ERR(header))
> >> - return PTR_ERR(header);
> >> + ret = vfio_info_add_capability(info, caps,
> >> + VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_SPARSE_MMAP, sparse);
> >> + kfree(sparse);
> >>
> >> - cap = container_of(header, struct vfio_region_info_cap_type, header);
> >> - cap->type = type;
> >> - cap->subtype = subtype;
> >> -
> >> - return 0;
> >> + return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> int vfio_pci_register_dev_region(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> >> @@ -704,7 +686,8 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data,
> >> if (vdev->bar_mmap_supported[info.index]) {
> >> info.flags |= VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP;
> >> if (info.index == vdev->msix_bar) {
> >> - ret = msix_sparse_mmap_cap(vdev, &caps);
> >> + ret = msix_sparse_mmap_cap(vdev, &info,
> >> + &caps);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> @@ -752,6 +735,9 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data,
> >>
> >> break;
> >> default:
> >> + {
> >> + struct vfio_region_info_cap_type cap_type;
> >> +
> >> if (info.index >=
> >> VFIO_PCI_NUM_REGIONS + vdev->num_regions)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> @@ -762,27 +748,23 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data,
> >> info.size = vdev->region[i].size;
> >> info.flags = vdev->region[i].flags;
> >>
> >> - ret = region_type_cap(vdev, &caps,
> >> - vdev->region[i].type,
> >> - vdev->region[i].subtype);
> >> + cap_type.type = vdev->region[i].type;
> >> + cap_type.subtype = vdev->region[i].subtype;
> >> +
> >> + ret = vfio_info_add_capability(&info, &caps,
> >> + VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_TYPE,
> >> + &cap_type);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >> +
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (caps.size) {
> >> - info.flags |= VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_CAPS;
> >> - if (info.argsz < sizeof(info) + caps.size) {
> >> - info.argsz = sizeof(info) + caps.size;
> >> - info.cap_offset = 0;
> >> - } else {
> >> - vfio_info_cap_shift(&caps, sizeof(info));
> >> - if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg +
> >> - sizeof(info), caps.buf,
> >> - caps.size)) {
> >> - kfree(caps.buf);
> >> - return -EFAULT;
> >> - }
> >> - info.cap_offset = sizeof(info);
> >
> > I prefer the case above, I'm fine with breaking out helpers to build a
> > buffer containing the capability chain, but I would rather have the
> > caller manage placing that back into the return structure. That also
> > allows the helper to be independent of the structure we're operating
> > on, it could be a region_info, irq_info, device_info, etc. It only
> > needs to know the layout of the capability type we're trying to add,
> > not the info structure itself. Thanks,
> >
>
> The capability feature is for region_info (VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_CAPS),
> then structure we are operating couldn't be irq_info or device_info, right?

My point was that I prefer the caller managing region_info.flags and
region_info.cap_offset, the helper only managing creating the
capability chain within the buffer. There is a namespace conflict for
the various capabilities though, each foo_info has their own space,
which can conflict, which make make a common helper impractical.
Thanks,

Alex

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-24 23:38    [W:0.078 / U:12.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site