lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V7 4/4] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: add MSI support for interrupts
On 2016-10-24 03:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>> On 10/21/2016 12:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> +static void hidma_free_msis(struct hidma_dev *dmadev)
>>>> > +{
>>>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>>> Perhaps one #ifdef and two definitions of functions?
>>
>> I don't think it will make a difference. I'll have to move
>> #ifdef around the caller of hidma_free_msis instead which
>> I think is uglier.
>>
>> The hidma_write_msi_msg function gets called only when
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN is defined. If I don't put
>> this around the function definition, I get unused function
>> warning from the compiler. This is the reason why preprocessor
>> definition is outside of the function definition.
>
> I am talking about something like below:
>
> #ifdef UGLY_DEFINE
> myfunc_a()
> {
> }
>
> myfunc_b()
> {
> }
> #else
> static inline myfunc_a() {}
> static inline myfunc_b() {}
> #endif
>
>
> There is another way as well, namely use of IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN()
> macros (I don't remember how exactly second one is spelt).


This was my initial approach. I was asked to remove the stub functions.
So, I did it.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-24 13:07    [W:0.059 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site