Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Walleij <> | Date | Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:47:02 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add SX150X GPIO Extender Pinctrl Driver |
| |
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote: >> Since the I2C sx150x GPIO expander driver uses platform_data to manage >> the pins configurations, rewrite the driver as a pinctrl driver using >> pinconf to get/set pin configurations from DT or debugfs. >> >> The pinctrl driver is functionnally equivalent as the gpio-only driver >> and can use DT for pinconf. The platform_data confirmation is dropped. >> >> This patchset removed the gpio-only driver and selects the Pinctrl driver >> config instead. This patchset also migrates the gpio dt-bindings to pinctrl >> and add the pinctrl optional properties. >> >> The driver was tested with a SX1509 device on a BeagleBone black with >> interrupt support and on an X86_64 machine over an I2C to USB converter. >> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> (...)
>> + ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&pctl->gpio, >> + &pctl->irq_chip, 0, >> + handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH); > > Adding irqchip with IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH triggers a WARN in > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1671, on a custom Vybrid board that I have with > the chip, so maybe it should be replaced with IRQ_TYPE_NONE? That's > what I did for my testing and with that change
I fixed this up when applying. It is corect, it should always be IRQ_TYPE_NONE unless it is a very old driver using boardfiles. The proper type is set up when the driver using it requests the IRQ.
Some drivers also need to set the default handler to handle_bad_irq and then also set that up in the irqchip .set_type() callback, especially those hardwares that have an ACK register for edge IRQs so that a second edge irq can come in when handling a first edge IRQ. Level IRQs don't have this problem for obvious reasons, so we need to select between handle_edge_irq() or handle_level_irq() on these hardwares.
Could you or Neil or both check if this applies to sx150x?
> Tested-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Thanks a lot Andrey!
Yours, Linus Walleij
| |