Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks | From | Gabriel Fernandez <> | Date | Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:52:54 +0200 |
| |
Hi Stephen,
On 10/19/2016 10:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/19, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> >> On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote: >>>> Gabriel Fernandez (6): >>>> clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks >>>> ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks >>>> arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON >>>> clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock >>>> clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock >>>> ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock >>> Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for >>> existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers >>> instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has >>> intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused. >>> >> Thanks for reviewing. >> >> Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there >> is a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into >> clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2. > Let's break the dependency by making the required property > optional or key off a different compatible string. As it stands > right now applying patch 1 will cause things to break until the > second patch lands which is not great. > >> You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue. >> >> > I'd prefer zero synchronization. Please just send the clk patches > the next time and leave the stuff for arm-soc out of the patch > series. Thanks. Ok
Many Thanks.
| |