lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] IIO wrapper drivers, dpot-dac and envelope-detector
From
Date
On 10/20/2016 04:53 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
[...]
> Good idea! Then the "envelope-detector,inverted" bool can go, and be
> implied by the compatible string. If some way to rebind the irq trigger
> is later discovered that can be added as a channel attr without
> deprecating any dt bindings stuff. While at it, the other properties
> ("envelope-detector,dac-max" and "envelope-detector,comp-interval-ms")
> could also be implied from the compatible string. Would that be better?
> I think so.
>
> But, the compatible string is one thing and the driver name is another.
> "axentia,tse850-envelope-detector" doesn't seem like the best of driver
> names...

The driver name is not that important we can still change that later if we
have to, the DT compatible string on the other hand is fixed.

>
> Are there any existing examples of drivers for (generic) things built
> with discrete components like this that could perhaps provide guidance?

Not that I'm aware of.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-20 17:30    [W:0.095 / U:0.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site