[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] crypto: ccm - avoid scatterlist for MAC encryption
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
<> wrote:
> On 17 October 2016 at 08:28, Johannes Berg <> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-10-15 at 18:16 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> The CCM code goes out of its way to perform the CTR encryption of the
>>> MAC using the subordinate CTR driver. To this end, it tweaks the
>>> input and output scatterlists so the aead_req 'odata' and/or
>>> 'auth_tag' fields [which may live on the stack] are prepended to the
>>> CTR payload. This involves calling sg_set_buf() on addresses which
>>> are not direct mapped, which is not supported.
>>> Since the calculation of the MAC keystream involves a single call
>>> into the cipher, to which we have a handle already given that the
>>> CBC-MAC calculation uses it as well, just calculate the MAC keystream
>>> directly, and record it in the aead_req private context so we can
>>> apply it to the MAC in cypto_ccm_auth_mac(). This greatly simplifies
>>> the scatterlist manipulation, and no longer requires scatterlists to
>>> refer to buffers that may live on the stack.
>> No objection from me, Herbert?
>> I'm getting a bit nervous though - I'd rather have any fix first so
>> people get things working again - so maybe I'll apply your other patch
>> and mine first, and then we can replace yours by this later.
> Could we get a statement first whether it is supported to allocate
> aead_req (and other crypto req structures) on the stack? If not, then
> we have our work cut out for us. But if it is, I'd rather we didn't
> apply the kzalloc/kfree patch, since it is just a workaround for the
> broken generic CCM driver, for which a fix is already available.

I'm not a crypto person, but I don't see why not. There's even a
helper called SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK. :) The only problem I know
of is pointing a scatterlist at the stack, which is bad for much the
same reason as doing real DMA from the stack.

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-17 19:10    [W:0.064 / U:5.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site