lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] perf bench futex: add NUMA support
Em Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:01:23PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:38:21AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:08:03PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escreveu:
> > > By default the application uses malloc() and all available CPUs. This
> > > patch introduces NUMA support which means:
> > > - memory is allocated node local via numa_alloc_local()
> > > - all CPUs of the specified NUMA node are used. This is also true if the
> > > number of threads set is greater than the number of CPUs available on
> > > this node.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/bench/Build | 4 ++
> > > tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/Build b/tools/perf/bench/Build
> > > index 60bf11943047..9e6e518d7d62 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/bench/Build
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/bench/Build
> > > @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> > > +ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > > +CFLAGS_futex-hash.o += -DCONFIG_NUMA=1
> > > +endif
> >
> > Jiri, do we really need this? I.e. aren't the CONFIG_FOO defines
> > available to tools?
>
> not directly ATM.. it's prepared for the .config customary setting feature
>
> meanwhile we set HAVE_* defines, like for CONFIG_NUMA we have:
> -DHAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
>
> you can check it in Makefile.config

So, Andrzej, can you use that instead? I merged the first patch already.

- Arnaldo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-17 17:05    [W:0.284 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site