[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [kbuild-all] fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h:96:2: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_96' declared with attribute error: XFS: sizeof(xfs_dir2_sf_entry_t) is wrong, expected 3
Hi Christoph,

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:45:56AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> head: 1001354ca34179f3db924eb66672442a173147dc
>That's Linux 4.9-rc1
>> 30cbc591 Darrick J. Wong 2016-03-09 @86 XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(xfs_dir2_data_unused_t, 6);
>But that's not how xfs_ondisk.h in 4.9-rc1 looks like

Yeah it's a bit confusing for old errors -- the git blame is on the
old first bad commit, which is

ab9d1e4f7b0217948a3b35a64178602ab30ff45d Merge branch 'xfs-misc-fixes-4.6-3' into for-next

>> 30cbc591 Darrick J. Wong 2016-03-09 @96 XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(xfs_dir2_sf_entry_t, 3);
>And that's line 119.
>Something is odd about this report.
>But both xfs_dir2_data_unused_t and xfs_dir2_sf_entry_t have one thing in
>common: they are strutures that aren't padded to a natural alignment at
>the end. It seems like the openrisc gcc does implicit padding for them,
>which sounds like a nightmware waiting to happen for any sort of disk
>or network structure, so I'm really not sure if we should work around
>it in xfs.

FYI the error for 'xfs_dir2_sf_entry_t' only shows up in openrisc;
and the 'xfs_attr_shortform_t' error only shows up in cris builds.

There is no errors for 'xfs_dir2_data_unused_t' in recent kernels.


 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-17 16:35    [W:0.033 / U:27.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site