lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] seccomp: Fix documentation
From
Date
Could someone push this please?

On 20/09/2016 19:39, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Fix struct seccomp_filter and seccomp_run_filters() signatures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
> ---
> kernel/seccomp.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> index 0db7c8a2afe2..494cba230ca0 100644
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -41,8 +41,7 @@
> * outside of a lifetime-guarded section. In general, this
> * is only needed for handling filters shared across tasks.
> * @prev: points to a previously installed, or inherited, filter
> - * @len: the number of instructions in the program
> - * @insnsi: the BPF program instructions to evaluate
> + * @prog: the BPF program to evaluate
> *
> * seccomp_filter objects are organized in a tree linked via the @prev
> * pointer. For any task, it appears to be a singly-linked list starting
> @@ -168,8 +167,8 @@ static int seccomp_check_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
> }
>
> /**
> - * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @syscall
> - * @syscall: number of the current system call
> + * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
> + * @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
> *
> * Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
> */
>

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-15 18:33    [W:0.087 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site