Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:20:45 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Device bindings documentation updated ACPI-enabled platforms not currently supported |
| |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com wrote: > > - is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "isslave"); > > Which tree is this based on? I cant see the existing isslave property in > mainline HEAD (commit 29fbff8698fc0ac1).
Same surprise here. Because I likely would have NAKed the binding.
Why is it needed? Doesn't the driver allow to be master/slave on the same bus?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |