Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID | Date | Thu, 13 Oct 2016 23:48:19 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 02:48:28 PM Luc, Piotr wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 21:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 08:25:50 PM Piotr Luc wrote: > > > > > > --- > > > Depends-on: x86/cpu/intel: Add Knights Mill to Intel family > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161012180520.30976-1-piotr.luc () intel > > > ! com > > > > First, putting broken URLs into patch tags doesn't really help. > > OK, with a series the link is not needed. I will refer to a patch > inside the series. > > > > > Second, please send all of these patches as a series where the first > > patch makes the change the rest depends on. That would make them > > easier to > > handle. > > > I see. I just wonder if I should send the entire series to all > maintainers that maintain individual modules/files or somehow limit > 'TO' recipients only to their modules. > Is any good method to it correctly?
The To: list should be possibly short. I would just send it To: x86@kernel.org and put the other addresses into the CC list.
Generally speaking, CCs of the entire series should go to all of the relevant maintainers (so they have a chance to respond to your patches in the context of the series) though.
Thanks, Rafael
| |