[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: Add an explicit barrier() to clflushopt()
On 01/07/16 14:29, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I would be very interested in knowing if replacing the final clflushopt
> with a clflush would resolve your problems (in which case the last mb()
> shouldn't be necessary either.)

Nevermind. CLFLUSH is not ordered with regards to CLFLUSHOPT to the
same cache line.

Could you add a sync_cpu(); call to the end (can replace the final mb())
and see if that helps your case?


 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-08 00:01    [W:0.077 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site