lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: factor work_pending state machine to C
From
Date
On 01/05/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently ret_fast_syscall, work_pending, and ret_to_user form an ad-hoc
> state machine that can be difficult to reason about due to duplicated
> code and a large number of branch targets.
>
> This patch factors the common logic out into the existing
> do_notify_resume function, converting the code to C in the process,
> making the code more legible.
>
> This patch tries to mirror the existing behaviour as closely as possible
> while using the usual C control flow primitives. There should be no
> functional change as a result of this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland<mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Chris Metcalf<cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon<will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 24 +++---------------------
> arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

This looks good, and also makes the task isolation change drop in
very cleanly (relatively speaking). Since do_notify_resume() is
called unconditionally now, we don't have to worry about fussing
with the bit numbering for the TIF_xxx flags in asm/threadinfo.h, so
that whole part of the patch can be dropped, and the actual
change to do_notify_resume() becomes:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index 3a6c60beadca..00d0ec3a8e60 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/tracehook.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>

#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
#include <asm/elf.h>
@@ -408,7 +409,8 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(void)
local_irq_disable();

thread_flags = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
- if (!(thread_flags & _TIF_WORK_MASK))
+ if (!(thread_flags & _TIF_WORK_MASK) &&
+ task_isolation_ready())
break;

if (thread_flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) {
@@ -428,5 +430,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(void)

if (thread_flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
fpsimd_restore_current_state();
+
+ task_isolation_enter();
}
}

For the moment I just added your two commits into my task-isolation
tree and pushed it up, but if your changes make it into 4.5 and the
task-isolation series doesn't, I will remove them and rebase on 4.5-rc1
once that's released. I've similarly staged the arch/tile enablement
changes to go into 4.5 so I can drop them from the task-isolation tree
as well at that point.

--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-05 20:21    [W:0.159 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site