lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] dax: fix bdev NULL pointer dereferences
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:34:30PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:28:15AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:38:58PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:35:04PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > > There are a number of places in dax.c that look up the struct block_device
> > > > associated with an inode. Previously this was done by just using
> > > > inode->i_sb->s_bdev. This is correct for inodes that exist within the
> > > > filesystems supported by DAX (ext2, ext4 & XFS), but when running DAX
> > > > against raw block devices this value is NULL. This causes NULL pointer
> > > > dereferences when these block_device pointers are used.
> > >
> > > It's also wrong for an XFS file system with a RT device..
> > >
> > > > +#define DAX_BDEV(inode) (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) ? I_BDEV(inode) \
> > > > + : inode->i_sb->s_bdev)
> > >
> > > .. but this isn't going to fix it. You must use a bdev returned by
> > > get_blocks or a similar file system method.
> >
> > I guess I need to go off and understand if we can have DAX mappings on such a
> > device. If we can, we may have a problem - we can get the block_device from
> > get_block() in I/O path and the various fault paths, but we don't have access
> > to get_block() when flushing via dax_writeback_mapping_range(). We avoid
> > needing it the normal case by storing the sector results from get_block() in
> > the radix tree.
> >
> > /me is off to play with RT devices...
>
> Well, RT devices are completely broken as far as I can see. I've reported the
> breakage to the XFS list. Anything I do that triggers a RT block allocation
> in XFS causes a lockdep splat + a kernel BUG - I've tried regular pwrite(),

Set CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=n (assert failure that can be ignored causing
the bug, and lockdep simply has an annotation problem) and it should
work.

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-01 00:01    [W:0.294 / U:0.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site