Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:39:46 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 4/8] Improve the tracking of active utilisation |
| |
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:36:51PM +0100, Luca Abeni wrote: > Ok, so I implemented this idea, and I am currently testing it... > The first experiments seem to show that there are no problems, but I > just tried some simple workload (rt-app, or some other periodic taskset > scheduled by SCHED_DEADLINE). Do you have suggestions for more > "interesting" (and meaningful) tests/experiments?
rt-app is the workload generator, right?
I think the most interesting part here is the switched_from path, so you'd want the workload to include a !rt task that gets PI boosted to deadline every so often.
Also, does rt-app let tasks die? Or does it spawn N tasks and lets them run jobs until the end? I think you want to put some effort in task_dead_dl() as well.
After that, just make sure rt-app generates a _lot_ of tasks such that the migration thing gets used.
Other than that, no, not really :-)
| |