lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH V4 16/16] ARM64: tegra: select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
    From
    [...]

    >
    > Any more thoughts on this?
    >
    > I have been discussing with Thierry and we think that selecting PM for
    > tegra still makes the most sense. The question is, is this ok for
    > multi-configs?

    Yes, this is too me the best option.

    Additionally, for those tegra SoCs/platforms that needs
    PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS, it can safely select that as well.

    >
    > The only other suggestion/thought I have is to allow
    > PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF to be selected independently of PM so that we can
    > have minimal support for PM domains that allows you to register PM
    > domains with the kernel and their current state, but does not allow you
    > to control them, etc. This way tegra could always select
    > PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF regardless of PM, and we would be able to
    > determine if we can probe a device safely.
    >
    > I am not sure that Rafael is too keen on this approach but that is the
    > only alternative I have come up with.

    I think Rafael already made his point around this approach, which is a
    clear no. And I fully agree with it.

    Kind regards
    Uffe

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-01-27 11:21    [W:4.189 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site