Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:41:23 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: ltc3589: make IRQ optional |
| |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:37:31PM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:26:10 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:
> > You're not just making the interrupt optional, you are also implementing > > polling support. That's really unusual and there's no clear reason for
> Any suggestions how to handle this case in a more sensible way?
The above, for example - make the interrupt optional. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |