Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:05:11 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [LKP] [lkp] [locking/mutexes] cb4bbc457b: -40.0% unixbench.score |
| |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:23:59AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> writes: > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, kernel test robot wrote: > > > >>FYI, we noticed the below changes on > >> > >>https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > >> Ding-Tianhong/locking-mutexes-don-t-spin-on-owner-when-wait-list-is-not-NULL/20160121-173317 > >>commit cb4bbc457bfed6194ffab1b10c7be73b3f16ca2d ("locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL.") > > > > I'm not sure why this would even be reported, as this patch has not been accepted > > or acked or nothin', by anyone. > > Sorry for bothering. The purpose is FYI as in the original report > email. We test patches posted to LKML, if we found some changes related > to the patch, we will send out a report. Hope the reviewer could > take that as information for his/her review if the report isn't totally > nonsense.
For me, the 0day reports on LKML postings have been quite helpful. They give the submitter immediate feedback on a number of issues, thus reducing the number of rounds of review.
Thanx, Paul
| |