lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 23:00 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
    > On 2016.01.19 at 21:58 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
    > > > On 2016.01.19 at 21:32 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    > > > > gcc 6 warns about various things in tools/perf  and with -Werror
    > > > > these turn into build failures.  One of them is a real though not
    > > > > very serious bug.
    > > >
    > > > I've already send patches for 1,2 and 4. See:
    > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/460
    > > >
    > > > Not sure what happened with them. Also your patch number 4 is wrong, you
    > > > should just delete the semicolon.
    > >
    > > I think that the busy-wait, intentional or not, may be a necessary
    > > part of the test case.
    >
    > Well, the author of the code thinks otherwise:
    >
    > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/269

    Oh I see, thanks.

    Ben.

    --
    Ben Hutchings
    Horngren's Observation:
    Among economists, the real world is often a special case.[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-01-19 23:21    [W:3.437 / U:1.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site