Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:04:13 +0000 |
| |
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 23:00 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.01.19 at 21:58 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > On 2016.01.19 at 21:32 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > gcc 6 warns about various things in tools/perf and with -Werror > > > > these turn into build failures. One of them is a real though not > > > > very serious bug. > > > > > > I've already send patches for 1,2 and 4. See: > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/460 > > > > > > Not sure what happened with them. Also your patch number 4 is wrong, you > > > should just delete the semicolon. > > > > I think that the busy-wait, intentional or not, may be a necessary > > part of the test case. > > Well, the author of the code thinks otherwise: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/269
Oh I see, thanks.
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings Horngren's Observation: Among economists, the real world is often a special case.[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |