Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.4 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Date | Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:32:59 -0800 |
| |
On 01/13/2016 09:44 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 12:38 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Hi Günter, >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:29:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >>>> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>>>> JFYI, when comparing v4.4[1] to v4.4-rc8[3], the summaries are: >>>>> - build errors: +13/-13 >>>>> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/9774/ (all 259 configs) >>>> >>>> + /tmp/ccnzCwY6.s: Error: can't resolve `_start' {*UND* section} - >>>> `L0^A' {.text section}: => 43 >>>> + /tmp/ccyAN6Ix.s: Error: can't resolve `_start' {*UND* section} - >>>> `L0^A' {.text section}: => 43 >>>> >>>> Various MIPS, the saga continues... >>> >>> Hi Geert, >>> >>> do you know which version of binutils is used by kisskb ? >>> If it is 2.23.90 or similar (ie below 2.24 and third level version >>> has more than one digit), there is a patch pending to fix it. >> >> No, I don't know. > > It dumps the GCC version, but not binutils. I should add that one day. > > The mips toolchain is pretty old, so it's using binutils 2.22. Are you saying I > need to update it? > Michael,
is your toolchain available somewhere as binary ? I'd like to add a single mips build test using it if possible.
Thanks, Guenter
| |