lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH V2 3/8] genirq: Add runtime power management support for IRQ chips
From
Date
Hi Jon,

On 12/17/2015 12:48 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some IRQ chips may be located in a power domain outside of the CPU
> subsystem and hence will require device specific runtime power management.
> In order to support such IRQ chips, add a pointer for a device structure
> to the irq_chip structure, and if this pointer is populated by the IRQ
> chip driver and the flag CHIP_HAS_RPM is set, then the pm_runtime_get/put
> APIs for this chip will be called when an IRQ is requested/freed,
> respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

I've tried to test these patches with OMAP GPIO and I see it works, in general.
"In general" - because OMAP GPIO has some code which is expected to be used
very late during suspend or when entering deep CPUIdle states, so I can't use
this approach "out-of-the-box" until i find the way to sort it out.

Hope some one else can try to test it with GPIO. Soren?

> ---
> include/linux/irq.h | 4 ++++
> kernel/irq/internals.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 3c1c96786248..7a61a7f76177 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h

...

>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index 2a429b061171..8a96e4f1e985 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -1116,6 +1116,10 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
> if (!try_module_get(desc->owner))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + ret = chip_pm_get(desc);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> new->irq = irq;
>
> /*
> @@ -1400,6 +1404,7 @@ out_thread:
> put_task_struct(t);
> }
> out_mput:
> + chip_pm_put(desc);
> module_put(desc->owner);
> return ret;
> }

Here I still think, that for this solution to be complete It might be good to add additional
API to request/free chained IRQs. This is not usual case for GPIO drivers,
but with AGIC it seems possible. If no objection I can do rfc.


> @@ -1513,6 +1518,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
> }
> }
>
> + chip_pm_put(desc);
> module_put(desc->owner);
> kfree(action->secondary);
> return action;
> @@ -1799,6 +1805,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, void __percpu *dev_
>
> unregister_handler_proc(irq, action);
>
> + chip_pm_put(desc);
> module_put(desc->owner);
> return action;
>
>


--
regards,
-grygorii

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-12 20:21    [W:0.223 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site