[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
SubjectRe: __might_sleep in uio_read()?
On Wed 02-09-15 15:45:10, Andy Grover wrote:
> Hi Hans and Greg,
> Is this an issue with uio? I swear it didn't used to throw this warning...
> Thanks -- Andy
> [ 5174.883261] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 5174.883617] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1532 at
> /home/agrover/git/kernel/kernel/sched/core.c:7389 __might_sleep+0x7d/0x90()
> [ 5174.884407] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at
> [<ffffffffa02a5821>] uio_read+0x91/0x170 [uio]

The warning says that the driver is calling copy_to_user with
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE which is wrong in general because this context can
sleep and a schedule would destroy the state. It doesn't matter here
because the code would break out from the loop regardless of the
copy_to_user return value.

I assume that TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE is necessary before the event_count
check to prevent from wake up races. If that is the case then you can
simply do:
diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio.c b/drivers/uio/uio.c
index 3257d4220d01..7d8959e3833b 100644
--- a/drivers/uio/uio.c
+++ b/drivers/uio/uio.c
@@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ static ssize_t uio_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf,

event_count = atomic_read(&idev->event);
if (event_count != listener->event_count) {
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
if (copy_to_user(buf, &event_count, count))
retval = -EFAULT;
else {
Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-03 14:41    [W:0.097 / U:8.576 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site