| Date | Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:19:15 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/11] sched: More notrace |
| |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> preempt_schedule_common() is marked notrace, but it does not use > _notrace() preempt_count functions and __schedule() is also not marked > notrace, which means that its perfectly possible to end up in the > tracer from preempt_schedule_common(). > > So either we need more notrace, or we need to remove notrace from > preempt_schedule_common().
More notrace is the right thing to do. We have enough pointless information in tracing already.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|