Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:30:46 +0300 | From | Mika Westerberg <> | Subject | Re: gpios search behaviour for gpio from _DSD |
| |
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 09:30:59PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > What i ment is, without strcmp, the loop would test for: > > reset-gpio and then reset-gpios (and then gpio and gpios) > > So why the strcmp at all, Why only reset-gpios? Will the _DSD or acpi break > and if we probe for reset-gpio (first, instead of reset-gpios)? I'm asking > because i'm trying some work on gpio lib and this section is getting > reworked too. While doing that I want to remove the strcmp. Hence, the > question if things break on the ACPI side (I'm mostly failiar with OF.
I think it is there because we really want to force "-gpios" format for named gpios (not "-gpio"). DT does not do it because they have lots of existing "-gpio" users whereas in ACPI there is no such burden.
| |