Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH 07/25] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:18:20 -0700 |
| |
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Note: "PK" is how the Intel SDM refers to this bit, so we also use that nomenclature.
This only defines the bit, it does not plumb it anywhere to be handled.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> ---
b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/mm/fault.c~pkeys-05-pfec arch/x86/mm/fault.c --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c~pkeys-05-pfec 2015-09-28 11:39:44.073097565 -0700 +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c 2015-09-28 11:39:44.076097701 -0700 @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ * bit 2 == 0: kernel-mode access 1: user-mode access * bit 3 == 1: use of reserved bit detected * bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch + * bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access */ enum x86_pf_error_code { @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code { PF_USER = 1 << 2, PF_RSVD = 1 << 3, PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, + PF_PK = 1 << 5, }; /* @@ -916,7 +918,10 @@ static int spurious_fault_check(unsigned if ((error_code & PF_INSTR) && !pte_exec(*pte)) return 0; - + /* + * Note: We do not do lazy flushing on protection key + * changes, so no spurious fault will ever set PF_PK. + */ return 1; } _
| |