lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned variable
From
Date
> It doesn't matter, as long as the type is available.

I suggest to make the circumstances better known when this will be the case.


>> How do you think about reuse another data type enumeration there?
>
> No idea what you mean by this.

A SmPL variable can also be connected with a data type list which is
discussed here.


>> How would you like to manage names for functions which are not defined
>> in the current source file?
>
> Why does it matter in this case?

* Will a command-line parameter like "--include-headers-for-types"
be needed here?

* Would it make sense to work with function name lists in SmPL constraints?


Will any fine-tuning be needed for the execution speed of the evolving
source code analysis?

Regards,
Markus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-26 17:41    [W:0.177 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site