Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned variable | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Sat, 26 Sep 2015 17:22:31 +0200 |
| |
> It doesn't matter, as long as the type is available.
I suggest to make the circumstances better known when this will be the case.
>> How do you think about reuse another data type enumeration there? > > No idea what you mean by this.
A SmPL variable can also be connected with a data type list which is discussed here.
>> How would you like to manage names for functions which are not defined >> in the current source file? > > Why does it matter in this case?
* Will a command-line parameter like "--include-headers-for-types" be needed here?
* Would it make sense to work with function name lists in SmPL constraints?
Will any fine-tuning be needed for the execution speed of the evolving source code analysis?
Regards, Markus
| |