Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:55:46 +0200 (CEST) | From | Julia Lawall <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned variable |
| |
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Your approach finds a function definition. > > Yes. - I assumed that it might also be relevant. > > > > > My approach works on the call directly, using whatever type information is available. > > The connection between the SmPL specification "f(...)@e" and the desired return type > was not obvious for me so far.
The nearest enclosing expression of the ) is the whole function call itself. e will thus match the entire expression. e is declared to have type t (where t is in practice signed int or whatever one wants to check for).
julia
| |