[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Make /dev/urandom scalable
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:07:54PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> Interestingly, based on what dieharder is already saying about performance,
> /dev/urandom is slower than AES_OFB (at least, on this particular system,
> happy to provide hardware specs if someone wants).

Yeah, not surprised by that. We're currently using a crypto hash
instead of AES, which means we're not doing any kind of hardware

Crazy applications that want to spend 100% of the CPU generating
random numbers instead of you know, doing _useful_ work
notwithstanding, /dev/urandom never had high performance as one of its
design goals. The assumption was that if you needed that kind of
performance, you would use a user-space cryptographic random number

- Ted

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-25 22:41    [W:0.070 / U:4.268 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site