[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: Add driver for Alphascale asm9260 pinctrl
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Oleksij Rempel <> wrote:
> [Me]
>> Why is it necessary for the driver to copy one description of
>> the pin into another?
> If i understand it correctly, pinctrl_pin_desc is essential part of
> pinmux framework. Theoretically i should define just statical array of
> this struct, but by this number of pins and functions it hard to keep it
> readable and error free. So i decided to create asm9260_mux_table which
> contains every thing i need. The side effect is higher memory usage
> since i need to create pinctrl_pin_desc on fly.
> May be i miss some thing?

I don't see how having code copying data from one data container
to another makes things "more readable and error free". Go for *one*
static definition. Also the memory waste is a total no-no.

Linus Walleij

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-25 19:21    [W:0.061 / U:26.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site