lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] perf/x86: test_aperfmperf and test_intel should be static
Date
Fixes the following sparse warnings:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c:13:6: warning: symbol
'test_aperfmperf' was not declared. Should it be static?

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c:18:6: warning: symbol
'test_intel' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c
index 086b12e..f32ac13 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c
@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ enum perf_msr_id {
PERF_MSR_EVENT_MAX,
};

-bool test_aperfmperf(int idx)
+static bool test_aperfmperf(int idx)
{
return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF);
}

-bool test_intel(int idx)
+static bool test_intel(int idx)
{
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
boot_cpu_data.x86 != 6)
--
1.9.1



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-24 14:01    [W:0.134 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site