lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: stop breaking dosemu (Re: x86/kconfig/32: Rename CONFIG_VM86 and default it to 'n')
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
> 02.09.2015 23:55, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> 02.09.2015 23:22, Josh Boyer пишет:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 02.09.2015 20:46, Josh Boyer пишет:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd be amenable to switching the default back to y and perhaps adding
>>>>>>> a sysctl to make the distros more comfortable. Ingo, Kees, Brian,
>>>>>>> what do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please leave the default as N, and have a sysctl option to
>>>>>> enable it instead? While dosemu might still be in use, it isn't going
>>>>>> to be the common case at all. So from a distro perspective, I think
>>>>>> we'd probably rather have the default match the common case.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that fedora doesn't package dosemu, doesn't automatically
>>>>> mean all other distros do not too. Since when kernel defaults should
>>>>> match the ones of fedora?
>>>>
>>>> I didn't say that.
>>>
>>> What you said was:
>>> ---
>>>
>>> While dosemu might still be in use, it isn't going
>>> to be the common case at all. So from a distro perspective
>>>
>>> ---
>>> ... which is likely true only in fedora circe.
>>>
>>>> The default right now is N.
>>>
>>> In a not yet released kernel, unless I am mistaken.
>>> If fedora already provides that kernel, other distros likely not.
>>>
>>>> I asked it be left
>>>> that way. That's all.
>>>
>>> Lets assume its not yet N, unless there was a kernel release already.
>>> Its easy to get back if its not too late.
>>
>> How about CONFIG_SYSCTL_VM86_DEFAULT which defaults to Y? Fedora
>> could set it to N.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand this sysctl proposal.
> Could you please educate me what is it all about?
> This sysctl will disable or enable the vm86() syscall at run-time,
> right? What does it give us? If you disable something in the
> config, this gives you, say, smaller kernel image. If OTOH you
> add the run-time switch, it gives you a bigger image, regardless
> of its default value.
> I might be missing something, but I don't understand what
> problem will this solve? Have I missed some earlier message
> in this thread?

For the 99%+ of users who don't use dosemu, it prevents exploits that
target vm86 from attacking their kernel.

--Andy

--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-03 00:01    [W:0.170 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site