[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
Subject[PATCH 2.6.32 61/62] dmaengine: fix missing cnt in ?: in dmatest
2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.


From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <>

On the latest tree my compiler has started giving the warning:

drivers/dma/dmatest.c:575:28: warning: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ?true?, suggest explicit middle operand [-Wparentheses]

The following patch fixes the missing middle clause with the same
fix that Nicolas Ferre used in the similar clauses.
(There seems to have been a race between him fixing that and
the extra clause going in a little later).

I don't actually know the dmatest code/structures, nor do I own
any hardware to test it on (assuming it needs a DMA engine);
but this patch builds, the existing code is almost certainly
wrong and the fix is the same as the corresponding lines above it.

(WTH is x=y?:z legal C anyway?)

Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <>
Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <>
(cherry picked from commit d07a74a546981a09ba490936645fbf0d1340b96c)

Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <>
drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
index a32a4cf..d7c282a 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static int dmatest_add_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PQ, dma_dev->cap_mask)) {
cnt = dmatest_add_threads(dtc, DMA_PQ);
- thread_count += cnt > 0 ?: 0;
+ thread_count += cnt > 0 ? cnt : 0;

pr_info("dmatest: Started %u threads using %s\n",

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-13 01:41    [W:0.193 / U:29.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site