Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:35:18 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 8/9] clocksource: Improve unstable clocksource detection |
| |
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:14:17 -0700 Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> wrote:
> > You think that blocking softirq execution for 42.9 seconds is normal? > > Seems we are living in a different universe. > > I don't say it's normal. I say it's not hard to trigger. > > > > it's just VM off. A softirq can hog the cpu. > >
Please provide a test case that shows the softirq hogging the cpu for over 40 seconds.
-- Steve
| |