Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:46:46 -0500 | From | Josh Poimboeuf <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 00/21] Compile-time stack validation |
| |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 12:23:32PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:07:50AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > This is v8 of the compile-time stack validation patch set, based on the > > > tip/master branch. > > > > > > The frame pointer macros are still called FRAME and ENDFRAME because I > > > don't think we converged on anything else yet. Otherwise I tried to > > > address all the other review comments from v7. > > > > So I think: > > > > FRAME_START > > FRAME_END > > (One last tweak to the bikeshed) > > The antonym of END is BEGIN. So how about: > > FRAME_BEGIN > FRAME_END
Ok, so thesaurus.com reminds me that words can have more than one antonym, and that START and BEGIN are both antonyms of END.
Personally, when I START something I usually FINISH it or even STOP it.
So I'll stop the bikeshedding I started and go with BEGIN/END.
-- Josh
| |