lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/14] Add Analogix Core Display Port Driver
From
Hi,

Could you rebase your serie onto linux-next or 4.2-rc8 ? it does not
apply here...

Regards,
Romain

2015-08-21 15:16 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:24:16PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
>> On 2015. 8. 21., at PM 7:01, Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Jingoo,
>> >
>> >> 在 2015/8/21 16:20, Jingoo Han 写道:
>> >>> On 2015. 8. 19., at PM 11:48, Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> .....
>> >>
>> >>> .../bindings/video/analogix_dp-rockchip.txt | 83 ++
>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt | 51 +-
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 10 +-
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 10 +-
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 12 +-
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts | 12 +-
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts | 12 +-
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 10 +-
>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 12 +-
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 5 +
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c | 1382 +++++++++++++++++++
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.h | 286 ++++
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_reg.c | 1294 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >>> .../exynos_dp_reg.h => bridge/analogix_dp_reg.h} | 270 ++--
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig | 5 +-
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Makefile | 2 +-
>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/analogix_dp-exynos.c | 347 +++++
>> >> Would you change this file name to "exynos_dp.c"?
>> >
>> > Sorry, I don't think so ;(
>> >
>> > I think IP_name+Soc_name would be better in this re-use case.
>>
>> So? Is there the naming rule such as "IP_name+SoC_name"?
>>
>> > Beside I see
>> > there are lots of driver named with this format in kernel, such as dw_hdmi & dw_mmc
>>
>> Please look at other dw cases.
>> For example, look at dw_pcie.
>>
>> drivers/pci/host/
>> pcie-designware.c
>> pci-spear13xx.c
>> pci-exynos.c
>>
>> In this case, pci-spear13xx.c and pci-exynos.c do not use "IP_name+SoC_name", even though these are dw IPs.
>>
>> Also, naming consistency is more important.
>> Now, Exynos DRM files are using "exynos_drm_" prefix.
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/
>> exynos_drm_buf.c
>> exynos_drm_core.c
>> ....
>>
>> However, "analogix_dp-exynos.c" looks very inconsistent.
>>
>> If there is no strict naming rule, please use "exynos_dp.c"
>> or "exynos_drm_dp.c".
>
> Exynos DRM maintainers get to pick their filenames, so Yakir, please
> rename as Jingoo suggested.
>
> Even if you didn't the first thing that would go into the Exynos DRM
> driver tree after this is merged is a rename patch anyway.
>
> Thierry


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-30 14:41    [W:0.126 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site