lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: SLUB vs SLAB allocator with respect to 3.x and 4.x kernels
From
Date
On 2015-08-27 10:26, Navin Parakkal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that in many worst case scenarios like fragmention of
> allocator , slub performs well than slab.
> I also noticed that Centos /Ubuntu etc switched to SLUB but SLES
> still uses SLAB in the default image.
>
> Any particular reason where SLAB is the choice ?
>
>
> I ask this since i find SLUB to be the default choice since 2.6.23 as
> per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLUB_(software)
>
IIRC, SLUB isn't available/reliable on some arches (that and in some
setups, the worst case scenarios are likely to never happen (for
example, a machine with 1T of RAM that get's rebooted daily isn't likely
to have significant issues with memory fragmentation)).

SLES probably hasn't switched because they're an enterprise distro,
which in turn means changing as little as possible when updating.


[unhandled content-type:application/pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-27 22:01    [W:0.042 / U:3.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site