lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mtd: nand: pxa3xx-nand: fix random command timeouts
Date
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> writes:

> On 12 Aug 06:22 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> This fix looks correct. Thanks!
>
> Couple questions:
>
> 1. In which platform are you seeing this bug?
zylonite with a pxa310 (ie. internal stacked NAND).

> 2. Is this a regression? (i.e. should we queue it for -stable?)
No, it's been there for ages I think.

> Also, one might question why we can't just write NDSR right after it's read,
> before we wake the IRQ thread or start DMA. It appears this is
> a requirement of BCH, as per the comment in drain_fifo.
For irq thread that won't make any difference, the irq handler will finish first
and clear the bits anyway. For DMA it's better.

And more generaly speaking, I like it better, to clear it once read.

> It would be nice to put a comment explaining why we clear NDSR only
> before the check to WRCMDREQ. Maybe even copy-pasting something
> from the commit log?
If we move it up to something like that :
status = nand_readl(info, NDSR);
nand_writel(info, NDSR, status);
Then the comment is overkill I think.

> I'd like to say "Yay, let's pick it" but I'd like to make sure this is
> tested on all platforms first (unless you've tested it already).
I tested on zylonite (where bug occurs) and cm-x300 (where bug never occurs).

Cheers.

--
Robert


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-17 00:41    [W:0.082 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site