Messages in this thread | | | From | Kukjin Kim <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o | Date | Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:01:23 +0900 |
| |
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > 2015-08-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>: > > On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote: > >> Commit "cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver > >> support" deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule > >> in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option. > >> > >> Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from > >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de> > >> --- > >> I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and > >> undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/). > >> > >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > >> index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile > >> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += arm_big_little_dt.o > >> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > And again from me: > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > > Dear Kukjin, > Can you take it and send in (updated) pull request with Exynos4x12 > cpufreq patches? > OK, sure. I'll take this.
Thanks, Kukjin
| |