lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.14 117/125] 9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC
Date
3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

commit a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 upstream.

If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must*
issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or
we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives
and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused
the same tag.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
net/9p/client.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -839,7 +839,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc
if (err < 0) {
if (err == -EIO)
c->status = Disconnected;
- goto reterr;
+ if (err != -ERESTARTSYS)
+ goto reterr;
}
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) {
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-31 23:21    [W:0.385 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site