Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:29:04 -0400 | Subject | Re: cgroup/loop Bad page state oops in Linux v4.2-rc3-136-g45b4b782e848 | From | Ming Lei <> |
| |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install >>>> images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines. Looking at the first >>>> instance of the oops, it seems to be a bad page state where a page is >>>> still charged to a group and it is trying to be freed. The oops >>>> output is below. >>>> >>>> Has anyone seen this in their 32-bit testing at all? Thus far nobody >>>> can recreate this on a 64-bit machine/VM. >>>> >>>> josh >>>> >>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382 >>>> >>>> [ 9.026738] systemd[1]: Switching root. >>>> [ 9.036467] systemd-journald[149]: Received SIGTERM from PID 1 (systemd). >>>> [ 9.082262] BUG: Bad page state in process kworker/u5:1 pfn:372ac >>>> [ 9.083989] page:f3d32ae0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:f2252178 index:0x16a >>>> [ 9.085755] flags: 0x40020021(locked|lru|mappedtodisk) >>>> [ 9.087284] page dumped because: page still charged to cgroup >>>> [ 9.088772] bad because of flags: >>>> [ 9.089731] flags: 0x21(locked|lru) >>>> [ 9.090818] page->mem_cgroup:f2c3e400 >>> >>> It's also still locked and on the LRU. This page shouldn't have been >>> freed. >>> >>>> [ 9.117848] Call Trace: >>>> [ 9.118738] [<c0aa22c9>] dump_stack+0x41/0x52 >>>> [ 9.120034] [<c054e30a>] bad_page.part.80+0xaa/0x100 >>>> [ 9.121461] [<c054eea9>] free_pages_prepare+0x3b9/0x3f0 >>>> [ 9.122934] [<c054fae2>] free_hot_cold_page+0x22/0x160 >>>> [ 9.124400] [<c071a22f>] ? copy_to_iter+0x1af/0x2a0 >>>> [ 9.125750] [<c054c4a3>] ? mempool_free_slab+0x13/0x20 >>>> [ 9.126840] [<c054fc57>] __free_pages+0x37/0x50 >>>> [ 9.127849] [<c054c4fd>] mempool_free_pages+0xd/0x10 >>>> [ 9.128908] [<c054c8b6>] mempool_free+0x26/0x80 >>>> [ 9.129895] [<c06f77e6>] bounce_end_io+0x56/0x80 >>> >>> The page state looks completely off for a bounce buffer page. Did >>> somebody mess with a bounce bio's bv_page? >> >> Looks the page isn't touched in both lo_read_transfer() and >> lo_read_simple(). >> >> Maybe it is related with aa4d86163e4e(block: loop: switch to VFS ITER_BVEC), >> or it might be helpful to run 'git bisect' if reverting aa4d86163e4e can't >> fix the issue, suppose the issue can be reproduced easily. > > I can try reverting that and getting someone to test it. It is > somewhat complicated by having to spin a new install ISO, so a report > back will be somewhat delayed. In the meantime, I'm also asking > people to track down the first kernel build that hits this, so > hopefully that gives us more of a clue as well. > > It is odd that only 32-bit hits this issue though. At least from what > we've seen thus far.
Page bounce may be just valid on 32-bit, and I will try to find one ARM box to see if it can be reproduced easily.
BTW, are there any extra steps for reproducing the issue? Such as cgroup operations?
Thanks,
| |