lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v6 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup sources
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo@kernel.org]
> Sent: 2015年7月27日 19:48
> To: Wang Shenwei-B38339
> Cc: jason@lakedaemon.net; Huang Yongcai-B20788;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; tglx@linutronix.de; shawn.guo@linaro.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup
> sources
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:50:15PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > The following structure is currently used in both drivers. The members
> > "gpc_base/ wakeup_sources/enabled_irqs" are now shared to PM driver.
> > And the macro IMR_NUM will be referred by both drivers too.
> >
> > struct imx_gpcv2_irq {
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > void __iomem *gpc_base;
>
> So this is the virtual base used by both irqchip and pm driver, and the lock is for
> register access protection, right? If so, we can define gpc as a syscon device,
> and access it from both drivers with regmap.

Regmap can be a solution too.

> > u32 wakeup_sources[IMR_NUM];
>
> This should be an irqchip internal data and exported to external users like pm
> code with an interface like imx_gpcv2_get_wakeup_sources().

Okay.

> > u32 enabled_irqs[IMR_NUM];


> I do not see how this is used in pm driver.
>
> > u32 cpu2wakeup;
>
> The only use of this in pm driver is to unmask interrupt #32 during initialization.
> Why cannot it be done in irqchip driver initialization?

Right. This line should be moved to irqchip driver.

Thanks.
Shenwei

> Shawn
>
> > };
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-28 16:41    [W:0.203 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site