Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:20:27 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation |
| |
Cc'ing Rob as well..
On 28-07-15, 08:41, Lee Jones wrote: > I have two issues with that. Firstly, although the driver uses the > OPP API (it also uses the Regulator and Clock API too), it is > fundamentally a CPUFreq driver, so I think it should have a CPUFreq > DT entry. Secondly, if someone doesn't know the history of the > ST CPUFreq set, they will look here for an accompanying document. I > personally wouldn't think to look in power/*opp* for a CPUFreq > binding. > > Perhaps, as all of the CPUFreq drivers use the OPP API, everything > should be moved to drivers/base/power or drivers/power?
Okay, looks fine :)
-- viresh
| |