Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: Add Broadcom iProc family support | From | Ray Jui <> | Date | Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:44:56 -0700 |
| |
Hi Olof,
On 7/27/2015 11:35 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> wrote: >> Hi Will, >> >> On 7/24/2015 1:51 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> (adding Olof) >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:29:42AM +0100, Ray Jui wrote: >>>> This patch adds support to Broadcom's iProc family of arm64 based SoCs >>>> in the arm64 Kconfig and defconfig files >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 5 +++++ >>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 ++ >>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >>>> index 318175f..969ef4a 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >>>> @@ -162,6 +162,11 @@ source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" >>>> >>>> menu "Platform selection" >>>> >>>> +config ARCH_BCM_IPROC >>>> + bool "Broadcom iProc SoC Family" >>>> + help >>>> + This enables support for Broadcom iProc based SoCs >>>> + >>> >>> The arm-soc guys have a patch moving the platform-related config options >>> out into Kconfig.platforms, so I think you need to co-ordinate with them. >>> >> >> Thanks for letting me know. I see that those patches are already merged >> into for-next under arm-soc. I guess I should generate a new patch >> series based on for-next and move this config option to Kconfig.platform? >> >> Olof, any comment? > > Yeah, please do that and send that series with arm@kernel.org on cc, > we'll apply it from there! > > > Thanks, > > -Olof >
Note this patch series contains some iProc PCIe patches as per-requsite that need to be applied before the ARCH_BCM_IPROC arm64 patch. Without the PCIe patch, arm64 build out of defconfig would be broken.
Bjorn has acked the PCIe patches. I'll re-send the entire patch series to you and arm@kernel.org and you can merge them there.
Thanks,
Ray
| |