lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/7] cpufreq-dt: add turbo modes support
Date
On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:03:40 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-07-15, 13:01, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> First of all, please don't be angry :).. We can discuss and get things
> sorted out ...

OK :)

> > This change was in the original patch posted in April:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/10/646
>
> Yeah, and I already apologized for missing the request :)
>
> > your review from a month ago didn't contain this request:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/22/667
>
> Your patch inserted almost 116 lines and most of the stuff was around
> adding new bindings to get things working with cpufreq-dt driver.
>
> And so I replied to the most important stuff, i.e. don't add new
> bindings, we will sort it out with opp-v2.
>
> And frankly that wasn't the time where we could have discussed how
> exactly we are going to use it. Ofcourse we should get it via DT,
> platform data is just not required.
>
> So, me not NAK ing this approach was fine as it wasn't about keeping
> this data in the platform data part.
>
> > and now (after nearly 4 months) you are telling me that
>
> I will say a month, as we discarded most of that patch recently :)
>
> > I should change this because you are planning to do some
> > more changes in the future.
>
> Its not about me doing some changes. But the whole point of doing the
> opp-v2 thing was to get rid of such platform data things..
>
> Just that your work is competing with opp-v2 code :)
>
> > Could we please keep it as it is for now and change it
> > later (after independent_clocks configuration will get
> > ported to use device tree)?
>
> I thought we can get your work to a better shape, with all credit to
> you. But if you have some dependency on this for 4.3, then I don't
> mind killing this structure after you have polluted it a bit more :)

Thank you. This is exactly the case here (I would like to get
Exynos4x12 conversion to use cpufreq-dt + exynos-cpufreq removal
in v4.3 if possible and adding new DT bindings will most likely
slow down the process considerably).

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-07-27 14:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog