Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:25:11 -0700 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] null_blk: LightNVM support |
| |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:48:00PM +0200, Matias Bj?rling wrote: > Only reason was to not duplicate the I/O submission/completion flow. > With the simple code at the moment, it is little to add. However, if > someone decides to put backing store, simulation, etc. into it, then it > should properly go into another module. > > Do you want me to move it into a new driver for this patchset?
I'd prefer to have it separate unless there's a good reason to merge it into null_blk. From your above descriptions it sounds like it really should be separate.
| |